Congratulations to
The 2 nd World Planning Schools Congress, 11-16 July 2006

Mexico City, Mexico.  

 


This site is provided by
College of Architecture and Urban planning, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning & Design Institute

4th International Seminar on Urbanism and Urbanization:European Tradition in Urbanism & its Future
Date: 2007-04-13   Publisher: GPEAN   Hit: 841

The European Tradition in Urbanism – and its Future

http://www.isuu.eu/

The 4th International Seminar on Urbanism and Urbanization aims to address both issues of permanence and change, as well as conformities and differences within urban practices of both a European and non-European context. A main focus of such a discussion is to establish patterns and methods of approach, which could provide valuable material for a discourse on the urban, set against a worldwide perspective.

The theme of the 4th International Seminar on Urbanism and Urbanization will be the European Tradition of Urbanism – and its Future. Delft University of Technology would act as host for this event scheduled to take place during September 2007. Since its inauguration as an annual seminar series, initiated by KU Leuven (February 2004), the discussion and seminar has been marked by follow–up events arranged by UPC Barcelona (June 2005) and the IUAV Venice (August 2006). This, the 4th International seminar, will be jointly organized by the Department of Urbanism and the Delft School of Design, both in the Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands.

Considerations and Aims

European cities and European urbanism

European cities and European urbanism are characterized by the notion of the city as a condition and expression of the civic society, based upon a ‘res publica’. This ‘res publica’ is deeply rooted in the essence of the urban form and social structure of most European cities. Through history the concern for a public domain has resulted into a wide variety of characteristics in urban form and urban policy, from the urban square as the centre of the urban society, to urban planning as an embodiment of public policy. As a result, we find a variety of balanced interrelationships between both the public and the private domain.

During the 20th century the relationship between urban development and social development has acquired a special dimension wherein the rise of urbanism, as a separate and particular discipline, coincides with the rise of the welfare state. With the cracks and fractures in the concept of the welfare state, and with the increase in a belief of the power of the global market, the definition of the ‘res publica’ and its spatial expression has, as a result, been transformed as well as placed under pressure. With this in mind, European urbanism has arrived at a crucial junction. The future of European urbanism will be related to the way the ‘res publica’ of the 21st century city can be defined as well as expressed within urban spatial forms and urban structures.

In general, ‘Europe’ can be considered as the territory between the North Pole and the Mediterranean, and between the Atlantic and the Ural. However, main characteristics of a European cities and its urbanism, are not limited to a strictly prescribed territory. The borders of what has been considered as ‘Europe’ have changed several times through historical evolution. Moreover, and with greater importance, it could be said that European culture has historically been deeply influenced by cultures from abroad, as well as exerting influence to ‘external’ cultures itself. Therefore, with our focus on a ‘European urbanism’ our intention is directed at investigating the specific characteristics which are explicitly present as form and as policy for many European cities. Furthermore, we seek to establish regions of influence wherein European urbanism has been influenced by external forces, or alternatively, where European urbanism has influenced urbanism beyond its own region or domain.

The first aim of this seminar is to define within levels of precision the common characteristics of a European urbanism, as well as any differences or variations which might arise within regional and temporal characteristics. Differences of character are defined herein as either being differences in periods, differences in regions, difference in city formations, and conclusively differences or similarities of regions of influence outside a ‘European world’.

Finally, a second aim seeks to investigate the potentials, questions and problems associated with the role of a European urbanism set against both the contemporary and future urban – as well as social – scenarios, for both within as well as outside of Europe.

Target groups

PhD-researchers, other scientists as well as professionals in the field of urbanism are invited to participate to the seminar.

Call for paper
Participants are invited to submit papers under the following sub-themes:
Sub-themes
  1. Spatial characteristics of the European City : the expression of the ‘res publica’ in urban form
    - Common and specific characteristics in different regions of Europe
    - Specific approaches in history

  2. Metropolitan and regional dimensions of European urbanism
    - Is the European city a midsize city ?
    - Metropolitan and regional dimensions of the public domain
    - The meaning and approach of specific territorial landscape characteristics

  3. European urbanism and the world: influences from and upon urban worlds abroad
    - The export of a ‘European model’ in colonial practices
    - Globalisation and the increasing influences of global markets

  4. Urbanism after the welfare state
    - The role of urban concepts in the process of forming the welfare state
    - The role of urban design and planning in the social composition of the city
    - The end of the triangle urbanism – social housing – state policy

  5. Urban planning as a public policy
    - The rise of urbanism as a scientific and professional discipline
    - The changing relations between planning and design
    -  From government to governance
[Author]http://www.isuu.eu  [Source]


   

2010-9-10
to
     
  • Colchester's Cultural Quarter - Development Competition2403
  • A Suburban World? Global Decentralization and the New Metropolis Int...2075
  • Dialogues in Urban and Regional Planning1956
  • ACSP 2007, October 18-21, 20071774
  • Minutes from 2006 Meeting GPEAN Coordinating Committee1768
  • AESOP2007 NAPOLI-10/14 JULY1767
  • APSA 2007--Towards an Asian Approach to Planning for Millennium Deve...1767
  • Planning Professional Associations1761
  • International Conference on China's Urban Transition and City Planni...1745
  • Inaugural meeting of the Association of African Planning Schools (AA...1701
  •  Today's News    00000
  •  Today's Visit   00007
  •  News Amount 00040
  •  Total Visiting 43140
    Whatever economic globalization or 'global village' is the very portrait of present world, no one can deny that, it is a wise choice, with world developing, to make every citizen enjoy all the peace, wealth and health maintained by human beings.
    Any action to hinder the knowledge from spreading is against the original intension of human.
    While on the other hand, to accelerate the spreading of the knowledge is proved to benefit those conferrers and dispensers, in particular the education course.
    And in this aspect, the discipline of urban planning begins with its first significant step.
    Promoted by of APSA, AESOP, ACSP and ANSAPS, the first World Planning Schools Congress was held in Tongji University in July, 2001. And there were nearly 1000 officials, scholars of urban planning, educators, students and practitioners gathered making a deep discuss on the common achievements in urban planning and construction, communicating actively on working experience, as well as referring to practical experience of the other countries, cities and research partners. Therefore it made a full success.
    According to the common sense of the above paragraph, to deliver the spirit to the whole world, 10 countries and transnational planning educational organizations, gathered signing the SHANGHAI STATEMENT on July 14th, which declares:on the goal of increasing mutual communication in order to improve the quality and visibility of planning and planning education. To achieve this, it was agreed to establish a global planning education association network and committees to plan holding the second World Planning Schools Congress and to develop an inclusive communication network.
    Here you see the web page of Global Planning Education Association Network directed by the spirit of the Shanghai Statement.
    Here we also provide various urban planning organizations with opportunities for mutual communication and immediate report on the significant events of worldwide urban planning, discussing on the developing tide of planning theory, even further, improving the function of urban planning in public life, in order to build a city system which is sustainable and impelling.
    What we want to put emphasis on is that this network not only exists in the infinite virtual digital world, but also is consisted of close relations between a myriad of scholars, schools and cities, which must be existing in real life and detailed common study. And we will try our best to bring up this cooperation and communication.
     

    If you have any suggestion, Please contact us: gpean@163.com
    Please recommend this website to your friends...Thank you!

    ICP05032680